I recently found myself reading a popular blog with many commenters which asserted that in order to have any hope of making a worthwhile living as an attorney, a law student had better attend a top 14 school, edit for the law review and finish in the top 20% of their class. Obviously this is utterly preposterous. Even a cursory survey of any mid-size to large jurisdiction reveals plenty of attorneys who attended “lesser” schools and yet somehow manage to cobble together a
respectable high-five to low-six figure income. In fact, a review of jurisdictions in Arizona reveals a distinct absence of correlation between success and attending a top 14 school. The vast majority of successful attorneys in Arizona attended one of the two state law schools. Where they finished is unknown, but that many of them are now sole practitioners or partners in small firm, it seems unlikely that their law school placement had the slightest impact on their long-term success.
But the assertions in that blog, unfounded and ignorant as they may have been, were not what left me unsettled. Rather, what struck me, were the several commenters who fearfully and desperately cried out to the author for help, trembling with terror at the prospect that they may have made some greivious mistake in deciding to attend law school. This unnerves me because it makes evident the fact that this one, insecure, blogger was not the only misguided individual who followed the law school path with the naieve and foolish belief that traversing that well-worn road would lead him to fame and fortune. It troubles me deeply to think that people are 1.) stupid enough to think this was the case and 2.) so motivated by greed that they would pursue a career they had no interest in.
The reality is that a law degree is not a ticket to high society. Many lawyers are poor. Many lawyers starve. In fact, far more lawyers struggle to pay their bills than become filthy rich. However individuals who are committed to their profession, devote extensive time and hard work and genuinely enjoy their work tend to excel. But even this isn’t enough. You have to have some aptitude for the practice of law. Simply getting into law school and surviving the courses does not magically imbue with the ability to perform as a lawyer absent any natural affinity for the activity. Yet some people seem to think it does.
What do you tell those people? ….Get an M.B.A.????

After all, would it bother you if I said that a study of newspaper crime articles showed that black men were three times as likely to rape white women as white men? If it wouldn’t, it should.
June 22, 2007
A Triscuit, a casket, a twinkie for fat ass
Posted by mockersanonymous under Diabetes, Dr. Phil, Fat Kids, Obesity, Rants, Social Commentary, T.V., Twinkies, UncategorizedLeave a Comment
Letting your child become clinically obese should be treated as felony child abuse. This is the notion that I have been unable to shake since yesterday when my mother-in-law played this episode of Dr. Phil off their DVR. At eight years old this boy was allowed to weight 185lbs. That is 8 fewer pounds than me and I am a heavier than average, 5’10 man. When asked how this happened, his mother exclaimed “I just gave him a cookie.” Unless it was one of those birthday cake cookies in the mall, and by one you mean 50, then somehow I doubt it.
The reality is that this child’s mother gorged him on food as a mean of coping with her own unhappiness and feelings of inadequacy. By over-providing and consistently letting the child eat whatever, whenever and however much he wanted, she enabled his obesity. I cannot fathom what that poor boy’s cardi-vascular system must have endured during his prolonged period of training for sumo. Though not a doctor, I can only imagine that if permitted to have a few more “cookies” his heart would have just given out from exhaustion and he would have flopped, jello like, dead onto the kitchen floor. I’m half kidding, but at the very least the child was seriously at risk for the development of heart disease, diabetes, gout and a slew of other illnesses causally linked to obesity.
At eight years old a child is like a dog; He is completely dependent on his caregiver for survival. Eight year olds cannot work, they cannot by and prepare food with an understanding of proper nutrition. Like a dog, that eight year old child is going to eat candy until he pukes or goes into sugar shock if you let him. Unabated, children will consume anything that pleases them until it stops pleasing them. Like the dog that eats an entire turkey off the table at Thanksgiving, the child will gorge himself without concern for any of the repurcussions. In this regard children depend on their parents.
Just as we expect parents to meet their needs of their children’s dependencies with regard to housing and medical care, so too should we expect them to meet the nutritional needs of their offspring. If a Mother injected her child with a deadly virus we would most certainly find her criminally liable for his death. There exists no practical difference between the sudden injection of a virulent toxin into his system and the systematic introduction of twinkies into his fat ass until he’s so obese he looks like a wax statue of Napolean after a fire.